Summary: When confronted with a plain-text message like “The provided text does not contain a story or main narrative to extract and rewrite. It appears to be a JSON response with an error message related to an insufficient account balance,” we need to resist the urge to intellectualize or decorate it with fluff. This isn’t just about broken code or user interface mistakes—it’s a blinking red alert on customer trust, platform credibility, and user retention. It's also a missed opportunity many businesses ignore until it's too late.
Why a JSON Error Message Isn’t “Just a Tech Issue”
Most developers and product owners look at error messages like trivial backend noise—something for the engineers to fix when they get a breather. But these messages are often the only communication your system has with the user during a moment of frustration. Flat, technical phrasing like "insufficient account balance" isn't just unhelpful—it communicates indifference. The user doesn’t care about the internal diagnostics. They're asking, silently but urgently, “Why can’t I do what I came here to do?”
Reading technical jargon without context is like hitting a locked door without a handle. The friction needs resolution, not confusion. If users get vague or dismissive language, what do you think they'll do? Leave. Complain. Or worse—they'll believe the platform doesn't respect their time, which oxygenates negative word-of-mouth and slows down adoption.
Behind Every Technical Message Is a Very Real Business Issue
Let’s unpack the phrase “The provided text does not contain a story.” On the surface, it’s a factual observation—suitable maybe for a parser, but not for a human. The problem here isn’t the correctness. It’s the lack of relevance to the user’s intent. A financial writer trying to pull data for an investor report isn’t concerned that the text has no narrative. They want to know what went wrong, what they can do about it, and whether they should worry.
This brings up a deeper question: Who are you talking to? If your platform returns error data in developer-speak to a marketing or product user, you're talking past them. And there’s no faster way to erode trust than to deliver silence masquerading as clarity.
No Story? Then Tell One About That
Even if the incoming data is just a JSON error with no narrative, your platform should still give context. Instead of saying, “There is no story to extract,” say, “We couldn’t find meaningful content in the input. Try uploading text with more structure, or contact us if this was unexpected.” That does three things: it keeps the user oriented, it shifts the visit from frustration toward a solution, and it sends a clear message—you care.
You’re not trying to entertain the user. You’re trying to keep them, serve them, and get them closer to their goal. The lack of story is the story. Your job as a business is to help them overcome that, not just log it and move on.
Letting Technical Precision Sabotage Customer Retention
Most SaaS products live or die by the emotional discipline of their communication. Sounds strange? It's not. Technical accuracy matters, but sterile tech feedback can strip you of emotional relevance. That’s an expensive tradeoff. Customers don't quit when tech fails—they quit when support fails, when explanations fall short, and when creators hide behind engineering lingo.
The phrase “insufficient account balance” might be technically valid, but it’s emotionally empty. What are they supposed to do next? Add credit? Contact support? Wait until the billing cycle resets? Your message has to answer the question they're silently asking: “What does this mean for me right now?”
Build Systems That Communicate, Not Just Compute
Let's shift perspective. Why not build error messaging as part of the product’s value? A user stuck on a payment screen should feel like they’re getting white-glove treatment, not being stonewalled by a robot. Companies that get this right—Stripe, Notion, Linear—they craft feedback like it’s customer-facing copy, because it is.
Here’s the test: Does every message your software spits out advance the user's understanding or path forward? If not, you're wasting the most valuable real estate in UX—moments of interruption. These are the places where empathy earns loyalty. They're also where bad explanations dig a permanent trust hole.
Get Their Attention, Then Respect It
The user already took action. They uploaded something. They submitted a request. They gave your product the benefit of the doubt. Once you're holding their attention, what are you doing with it? Are you helping them push through friction—or just throwing code-messages over the wall?
This is where language earns compound interest. “No data to extract” can become, “We weren’t able to process that. Here’s how to fix it, and we're here if you need help.” Do that consistently, and you don’t just fix isolated support moments—you build a reputation.
How You Speak in Errors Will Determine How Long They Stay
People forgive accidents. They do not forgive coldness. If your platform feels robotic during breakdowns, your users will never trust it during growth. Emotions are sticky. Fail positive—not silent. Script every low moment with the same empathy and precision you reserve for your sales copy.
And remember: every useless error message is an opening—either for your support desk to get overwhelmed, your churn rate to tick up, or your competitor to look smarter, faster, and more caring.
Human-focused, outcome-aware communication in software isn't fluff—it's part of the product. Clean up your messaging, especially the ugly parts. And if your users are receiving responses like “The text contains no story to extract,” start asking: What part of our business thinks that's enough?
Your communication is always either a bridge or a wall. Which one are your error messages building?
#UXWriting #UserRetention #ErrorMessaging #SaaSMarketing #CustomerTrust #B2BStrategy #ProductCommunication
Featured Image courtesy of Unsplash and SEO Galaxy (yusHnkBhF3Q)