Summary: The web is shifting from a human-first place to a mixed ecosystem where autonomous AI bots already account for a measurable slice of visits. New data from TollBit and Akamai, plus the rise of agents like OpenClaw (formerly Moltbot / Clawdbot), show this change is not hypothetical. Bot traffic is growing fast, scraping techniques are getting smarter, defenses are getting more aggressive, and businesses must decide whether to block, charge, or partner with these new visitors. What follows is a practical, evidence-based look at the problem, the players, the options, and the trade-offs for publishers, platforms, and commercial sites.
What the numbers say: bot traffic is rising
TollBit’s tracking and Akamai’s telemetry point to one clear pattern: bot activity tied to AI training and live agents climbed steeply over the last year. TollBit reports that in Q4 2025 roughly one in every 31 visits to some customers’ sites came from an AI scraping bot—up from one in 200 visits in Q1. Akamai’s engineers see parallel growth in training-related requests since mid-2025. Those figures are not academic. They mean real server load, skewed analytics, and a fresh market for scraped content.
Beyond raw volume, behavior changed. TollBit found more than 13 percent of bot requests bypassed robots.txt in Q4, and the fraction of bots ignoring robots.txt rose nearly fourfold between Q2 and Q4. At the same time, sites trying to block AI scrapers rose by 336 percent. The result: an escalating arms race between scrapers and defenders.
Who the main players are
OpenClaw — previously Moltbot and Clawdbot — is the public face of a broader trend: chatbots and agents that fetch live web content to answer questions. Behind these agents sit scraping firms like Bright Data, ScrapingBee, Oxylabs, and others that provide the plumbing. Platform companies and publishers such as Condé Nast are pushing back via legal action and technical countermeasures. Infrastructure providers — Cloudflare, Akamai — and startups like TollBit sell defensive and monetization tools. Then there are firms like Brandlight that take the opposite tack, trying to surface content to AI tools through what they call generative engine optimization (GEO).
How bots are getting past defenses
The newest scraping techniques are not brute force. They imitate human interaction. Bots are masking their HTTP headers, executing JavaScript, throttling request timing to match human browsing, and even simulating mouse movement patterns. Some behave in ways that make them almost indistinguishable from legit users. That’s by design: if your defense flags them, they’ll adapt. TollBit’s report documents agents that cleverly obey just enough site behavior to stay under thresholds and bypass robots.txt or paywall checks.
Why publishers and platforms are alarmed
Publishers face three direct harms. First, copyright and licensing: scraped content may train models that republish or summarize material without permission. Second, revenue diversion: if an AI answers a question using scraped text, the user never visits the original site, and ad or subscription revenue is lost. Third, operational cost: scraping increases bandwidth and server load, raising hosting expense. These concerns explain why several publishers have moved to litigation and active blocking measures.
Why some scrapers claim legitimacy
Scraping firms argue public web content is meant to be machine-readable, and there are legitimate use cases: price monitoring, cybersecurity research, market intelligence, and investigative reporting. Firms such as Oxylabs claim policies that exclude scraping behind logins and paywalls. Bright Data emphasizes nonpublic data avoidance after multiple lawsuits. There is truth here: automated access has many valid uses. But that claim collides with publishers’ rights and business models when scraping is done at scale to seed commercial AI products.
The legal and ethical front
Lawsuits from publishers against AI companies make the legal dimension visible. Some cases have been dismissed or withdrawn; others are ongoing. The law will shape permissible scraping, but courts move slowly. Meanwhile, ethical questions remain: should a trained model be allowed to reproduce proprietary reporting or curated product reviews? Can site owners demand payment for machine access while still serving human readers for free? These are negotiable issues — and they will be resolved not only in court but in contracts, technical standards, and market conventions.
Options for website owners: block, charge, surface
Site operators have three strategic choices, sometimes combined:
1) Block: Harden defenses with bot management, fingerprinting, and rate limits. That reduces unwanted scraping but risks false positives that block legitimate users or essential services like search indexers and research crawlers.
2) Charge: Open a programmatic, authenticated channel that sells machine-readable access. TollBit and others offer ways to meter and bill AI scrapers. This creates a predictable revenue stream, but it requires coordination and trust: who enforces compliance and how are prices set?
3) Surface: Optimize content to appear in AI agents via GEO. Brandlight and similar firms view AI as a marketing channel and help content be discoverable inside generative outputs. That approach treats bot traffic as an opportunity for distribution and commerce.
Which choice fits your business? Ask the right questions
Do you depend on ad impressions or subscriptions? What fraction of your traffic can you attribute to referral and search versus direct visits? How costly is extra bandwidth? Are your editorial assets a core competitive advantage, or are you willing to trade exposure for new downstream revenue? Those are the questions leaders must answer. No is a valid move: declining machine access until a fair contract exists is a negotiation position, not a weakness. What would you sacrifice — or demand — in return for granting programmatic access?
Technical measures that work (and their limits)
Bot detection that combines behavioural analysis, device fingerprinting, and anomaly detection improves signal over single-rule systems. CAPTCHA and login walls stop many scrapers but reduce usability. Robots.txt remains advisory; modern bots ignore it when they choose. Signed APIs or token-based access are the only robust way to separate human browsing from sanctioned machine access. Still, APIs require maintenance and business terms. Do you create an API and charge for it, or do you lock down content and risk being bypassed?
Market responses: new services and business models
We already see companies building the tools to monetize, monitor, and manipulate this traffic. TollBit sells metering and charging solutions. Cloudflare and others add bot management features. Geo-focused firms help brands appear inside AI responses. The market will bifurcate: firms that monetize machine access, firms that block aggressively, and intermediaries that broker deals between content owners and AI companies. Which side will your firm choose to occupy?
Negotiation as strategy: how to engage AI companies
Treat AI firms like customers. Ask them open-ended questions: What data do you need? How will you authenticate and pay? What guarantees will you offer about attribution and usage? Mirror their key phrases — "machine-to-machine exchange of value," "respecting site boundaries" — to keep the conversation grounded. Use calibrated questions: How would you propose to compensate publishers fairly while still delivering value to your users? Let them solve the problem in their terms while you hold the power to say No until terms meet your standards.
Practical checklist for publishers and web businesses
- Audit traffic sources to estimate bot impact. - Measure server costs tied to scrapers and quantify lost monetization from nonhuman visits. - Decide whether to offer a paid API or a blocking posture; model the revenue scenarios for each. - Implement token-based access and logging for machine clients. - Build contractual terms that specify permitted uses, attribution, and fees. - Use selective blocking to protect high-value content while allowing benign crawlers. - Run small pilots with trustworthy partners to test monetization before wide rollout.
How marketers should think about GEO and the new marketing channel
Generative engine optimization treats AI outputs like another distribution layer. That has consequences for messaging, measurement, and creative. If AI agents summarize your content, the lead must still point back to you — or you must get paid for the summary. Marketers should test content formats that work inside AI answers: concise facts, structured metadata, clear attribution hooks. Commit to consistent tagging and pricing for machine access. If you want AI to promote your product, what would you pay for that placement? Ask that question and be ready to commit.
Opportunities amid the conflict
Conflict breeds markets. The scramble creates demand for bot-management tech, compliance services, legal expertise, and marketplaces that broker machine access. Entrepreneurs will sell better ways to verify bots, to collect fees, or to declare safe public datasets. Companies that solve attribution and payment at scale will capture value. Would you build the bridge, guard the bridge, or charge tolls on it?
Empathy and a path forward
Publishers fear revenue loss and erosion of editorial control; scraping firms emphasize openness and legitimate uses. Both positions are valid. A practical solution recognizes that both human readers and machine clients have value. Designers of the future web should ask: How do we create a transparent, programmatic market where content owners receive value and AI services deliver utility? That question opens negotiations that can produce standards, APIs, and payment models that respect both sides.
Final thought — choose intentionally
The web is changing because agents like OpenClaw can fetch and fold live content into answers. The growth of AI bot traffic is a business problem, a technical problem, and a governance problem. You can react by hardening your site, by charging for access, or by leaning into GEO and treating AI as a new channel. What you must not do is default to passive hope. Say No when necessary, ask the hard questions, and open disciplined conversations that convert friction into contracts. What will your next move be?
#AIBots #WebTraffic #WebScraping #BotManagement #GenerativeAI #GEO #PublisherStrategy #OpenClaw
Featured Image courtesy of Unsplash and Enchanted Tools (PzAGQOzyBec)